厦门大学学者库

中文论文

论文题名
科举制度的重建对清王朝稳定的意义
英文题名
Historical Probe on the Administration Setup from the Implementation of Chinese Imperial Examination System during the Early Qing Dynasty
作者
王日根;章广
作者单位
厦门大学人文学院
期刊名称
湖北大学学报(哲学社会科学版)
CN号
42-1020/C
ISSN
1001-4799
出版日期
2016-11-22
卷
v.43;No.226
期
06
页码
45-52+170
中文关键词
科举制度;人才选拔;政权确立
英文关键词
中文摘要
科举制度这个中国古代重要的选官制度,自隋朝建立后,一直延续发展,并不因王朝的变更而中断,亦已被士民普遍认可与接受。清王朝政权的确立几乎与日益全面地推行科举制度密切相关,满洲在入关之前即认知了科举,随后积极且越加快速地实施科举制度,其间经历了从皇太极时的不完善,顺治时汉人的逐步呼应,到康熙时全面接受、完善科举制度,建立除常科外,加以制科、荐举等辅助手段在内的文化交融政策体系。科举制度的实行对收拢民心,培养社会各阶层对政权的认同,选拔治国人才,确立与巩固王朝统治均产生了重要影响。
英文摘要
The civil-service examination system is an important officer selection system in ancient China, and it was set up after the establishment of the Sui dynasty. This system develops continuously without interruption of dynastic changes, and it is widely accepted by officers and common people. The establishment of the Qing dynasty is closely related to the comprehensive implementation of the imperial examination system. Manchu has already recognized the importance of the imperial examination system before the entry and speeds up its implementation afterward, during which it experiences imperfection from the Huang Taiji period(1620s-1630s) to the gradual consensus in the Shun Zhi period(1640s-1650s), and then it is comprehensively accepted and improved in the Kangxi period(1660s-1720s). What is more, cultural blending policy system including "chang ke", "zhi ke" and"recommendation" are established. The implementation of this system has a significant influence on winning the support of common people, the cultivation of social stratums' recognition for political power, the selection of governing talents, and the founding and consolidation of the regime.
参考文献
[1]刘海峰.科举制的起源与进士科的起始[J].历史研究,2000,(6). [2]王戎笙.科举考试与明清政治[M]//中国社会科学院历史研究所明清史研究室.清史论丛(2002年号).北京:中国广播电视出版社,2002. [3]中国第一历史档案馆.内阁藏本满文老档:太祖朝汉文译文[M].沈阳:辽宁民族出版社,2009. [4]太宗文皇帝实录[M].北京:中华书局,2008. [5]赵尔巽.清史稿[M].北京:中华书局,1976. [6]李桓.国朝耆献类征初编[M]//清代传记丛刊.台北:明文书局,1985. [7]王钟翰.清史列传[M].北京:中华书局,1987. [8]世祖章皇帝实录[M].北京:中华书局,2008. [9]李调元.淡墨录[M].沈阳:辽宁教育出版社,2001. [10]阿桂.盛京通志[M].沈阳:辽海出版社,1997. [11]何炳棣.明清社会史论[M].徐泓,译注.台北:联经出版事业股份有限公司,2013. [12]汪维真.明代乡试解额制度研究[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2009. [13]英汇,等.钦定科场条例:卷十九·各省乡试定额[M]//续修四库全书:八三○·史部·政书类.上海:上海古籍出版社,2002. [14]李润强.清代进士群体与学术文化[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2007. [15]梁章矩.制义丛话[M].上海:上海书店出版社,2001. [16]圣祖仁皇帝实录[M].北京:中华书局,2008. [17]李弘祺.宋代官学教育与科举[M].台北:联经出版事业公司,1994. [18]余秋雨.山居笔记[M].上海:文汇出版社,1999. [19]宋元强.清朝的状元[M].长春:吉林文史出版社,1992. [20]王定保.唐摭言[M].西安:三秦出版社,2011. [21]张宝昆,谭开林.大规模教育考试控制社会流动功能研究[J].北京联合大学学报:综合版,1998,(4). [22]王日根.中国科举考试与社会影响[M].长沙:岳麓书社,2007. [23]王亚南.中国官僚政治研究[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1981. [24]陈怡山.海滨外史[M]//中国野史集成:第四十九册.成都:巴蜀书社,1993. [25]江庆柏.清朝进士题名录[M].北京:中华书局,2007. [26]梁启超.中国近三百年学术史[M].长沙:岳麓书社,2010. [27]王应奎.柳南续笔[M].北京:中华书局,1983. [28]刘海峰,李兵.中国科举史[M].上海:东方出版中心,2004. [29]钱仪吉.碑传集[M].台北:明文书局,1991. [30]中国第一历史档案馆.清初内国史馆满文档案译编:上[M].北京:光明日报出版社,1989. [31]史革新.清代理学史:上[M].广州:广东教育出版社,2007. [32]霍有明,郭海文.钦定学政全书校注[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,2009. [33]小横香室主人.清朝野史大观[M].北京:中央编译出版社,2009. [34]满清稗史[M].北京:中国书店,1987.
基金
教育部人文社会研究基地厦门大学高等教育发展研究中心重大资助项目:13JJD880010

返回